In Which Entirely Too Many Words Are Devoted to Adrian Mutu

By: Martha | November 6th, 2006

Mmm...MutuWatching the Roma-Fiorentina game yesterday — particularly the uninspired first half — I had a lot of time to think. And, apart from the obvious (Things like “How is Totti so pretty?”, and “When Roma are playing well, they make you forget how boring they are when they’re not.”, and “Why do I hate Christian Panucci so much? I thought it was just that stupid haircut, but it’s gone and I still hate him. Am I bad person?”), most my brain power was expended considering Adrian Mutu. It’s pretty much indesputable that he’s mind-blowingly talented, right? And he’s had a few very impressive years in his career, has been the best Romian player on earth for a long time, and exhibits little flashes of skill that make your mouth hang open. So why isn’t he a superstar of world football? What the hell happened?

Would things have been different if he hadn’t gone to Chelsea? Maybe (especially if they don’t have coke in Parma). Of if he’d hung on at Chelsea, and either not gotten high or received the Maradona treatment, and turned in the physio’s pee for testing instead of his? Again, maybe — though it’s unlikely his inability to get along with Mourinho had much to do with drugs. And, based on available evidence, one wonders if he could have handled the pressure in London. Really, the Roma game was sort of a microcosm of Mutu’s recent career (I told you I expended a lot of brain power on this):

The absence of Toni gave him a chance to be the focus of the attack, and he was clearly eager to seize the opportunity. He started brightly, as the Brits say, running all over the pitch, eager as hell, and creating chances for himself and others. He looked like a little kid out there, the smart 12-year-old who’s more skilled than the rest of his team and works to make them all better, rather than trying to win by himself. It was awesome. But after about 30 minutes, he had essentially vanished. And, by the end? There was a great shot on GolTV of Mutu literally standing by the touchline, watching the game happen in front of him. He didn’t move, either to make a run or go win the ball — just couldn’t be bothered.

So, to recap:

1)Mutu gets the chance to be the focus of the attack and get all the praise and attention;
2)Mutu is a genius for 30 minutes;
3)Roma doesn’t quit when the go behind;
4)Mutu says (translated from the Romanian) “Mommy this is hard!”;
5)Mutu checks out;
6)Mutu (hopefully) get a post-game ass-kicking from Montolivo, another brilliantly skilled player who — check this out — actually spent the game trying to find a way to win.

So, yeah — you start to see why he never stays at a club for more than a year or two. People sign him to long contracts assuming he’s finally grown up and then, like freaking clockwork, he proves them wrong. Hey, Adrian, dude — life is hard. You’re 27 years old. If you don’t want to end your career as one of those to-be-pitied guys who totally fail to live up to their talent, SUCK IT UP.

That said, even when he’s pouting, the man does rival even Totti in the looks department. So, you know, there is that.




Category Category: Fiorentina, Mutu, Roma, Serie A

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:In Which Entirely Too Many Words Are Devoted to Adrian Mutu digg:In Which Entirely Too Many Words Are Devoted to Adrian Mutu reddit:In Which Entirely Too Many Words Are Devoted to Adrian Mutu fark:In Which Entirely Too Many Words Are Devoted to Adrian Mutu Y!:In Which Entirely Too Many Words Are Devoted to Adrian Mutu stumbleupon:In Which Entirely Too Many Words Are Devoted to Adrian Mutu

Comments  

  • Paul |  November 6th, 2006 at 1:33 pm

    cornercorner

    I think you’re spot on with Mutu. He has stretches when he looks like he could win the Ballon D’Or, and then he just gets bored/frustrated and goes missing. I never understood that about him.

    Just curious what your thoughts are about Rodrigo Taddei and Amauri. Taddei already has an Italian passport and Amauri is about to get one; would you like to see Donadoni pull them into the Azzurri?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Marco |  November 7th, 2006 at 4:13 am

    cornercorner

    this is what i think .. i think donadonadoni needs to go .. he is no good … any way i donno about tadeei and amuri, i mean id let they play at lleast one game for the national team so they cant play ofr any other national team, but i hope italy does not become like france, where france go to africa and take all there good players and then claim them as French .. however i have alwasy belivved that if you learn your trade and earn you money in a country, then you should represent them,

    Posted from Australia Australia

    cornercorner
  • Martha |  November 7th, 2006 at 1:05 pm

    cornercorner

    I tend to disagree with you, Marco, at least as far as bringing in a player into the squad once to keep him from ever playing somewhere else is concerned — ouch. Plus, Italian fans came around to Camoranesi pretty quickly once the team started winning with him in the side, right? Paul, I know Amauri still is holding dreams of playing for Brazil — if he ever officially gives that up (considering how well he’s playing, he might not have to), it’d be interesting to see what Donadoni does. Certainly if Taddei and Amauri were native-born Italian, he’d have to give them a hard took, based on their current form.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Paul |  November 7th, 2006 at 5:53 pm

    cornercorner

    Martha, I think if they were native born Italians, they would already have been included in the side. I think each would offer a fair amount of creativity to the team in the absence of Totti or Pirlo. I do feel a little uncomfortable with the idea of allowing foreigners into the team, not because of nationalism, but because I don’t like to see good players poached from countries that aren’t necessarily capable of producing a lot of talented players.

    What I think would happen is a lot of players from smaller countries will play for the bigger nations (i.e. europe) at the expense of their home nations because they’ll be assured of payment and receive greater exposure. A country like Senegal or Ivory Coast would be significantly better if France and the Netherlands did not poach their nationals, but these countries lack the infrastructure to compete with Europe.

    With Brazilians and Argentines, I think its different because these guys would otherwise never get a chance to represent their country due to an overabundance of talent. I’m not sure though and it’s a tough question that makes me squeamish. I think I’d rather just appreciate this rich vein of form that Amauri is using to keep Palermo on top of the league.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


Italy Forums

Voice your opinion on the latest Italy news at our Italy Forums


Italy National Team News

Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners



Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email italy[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives