Some NEWS 07/07/11

By: Dylan | July 7th, 2011
   

As we count down the days to the upcoming season, everyone is closely following the comings and goings of the transfer window. For the next few weeks I will start many news posts with transfer rumours. Followed by the main stories in the papers.

  • Although Roma insist it’s not going to happen, many news agencies continue to report they are on the verge of snapping up Erik Lamela. River Plate’s recent relegation means they have had to lower the playmaker’s price to 12 million euros. Lamela would sign a five-year contract, earning 1.5 million euros a season.
  • Spainish newspapers are claiming that Atletico Madrid have rejected a 35 million euro bid for Sergio Aguero from Juventus. The Bianconeri also reportedly offered full ownership of Tiago Mendes. It looks as though the Argentine striker is set to stay in Madrid instead, as Real will pay the 45 million euro buy-out clause.
  • Napoli’s Ezequiel Lavezzi has quashed rumours of a reported move to Manchester City though his agent. Insisting he has “never” been contacted by the blue half of Manchester. Although their seems to have been no contact, Lavezzi also says that if an offer did come in he would have to “talk to Napoli”. With fellow countryman Carlos Tevez on his way out, El Pocho would be an ideal replacement.
  • Rolando Bianchi looks set to join either Parma or Siena from Torino. A move to Serie A looks very likely as Torino are looking to raise cash quickly. He is a solid striker and will constantly get goals despite his age.

FIGC News
The Italian FA (FIGC) have raised the limit of non-EU players that can be bought per year. Previously clubs were only allowed to bring in one non-EU player, but it has now been increased to a maximum of two. Many predict this move will revolutionise spending. I can only see this move as positive considering Italian leagues are losing their credibility more and more every day. Lega Serie A President Maurizio Beretta explained the benefits and agreement:

“The return to two non-EU players restores competitiveness to Italian football. All the elements were in sync regarding this decision – Serie A, B, Lega Pro and amateurs.”

In other FIGC news, it looks almost certain that Inter will lose their 2006 Scudetto after the FIGC hold a final meeting regarding their findings from the Calciopoli II trial in Naples. Although they look unlikely face further sanctions. Chief investigator Stefano Palazzi has accused Inter of fraud. As many recorded phone conversations between former Inter officials and referee designators have been found. The strangest fact of all is according to the findings of the FIGC’s chief investigator, it is Inter, Milan and Livorno who should have been relegated in 2006 and not Juventus. This will certainly cause much debate between fans and journalists, but my question is: who is really to blame? If the findings are correct, why were Juve sent down?


Some Related Serie A Posts:


Tags

   
  • Comrade

    Who do you support, Dylan?

  • Dylan

    As a kind of a game, I'm going to let people guess and I'll reveal it later on. See if you can find out through my writing.

  • Richard Higham

    How can I find preseason games on Sicily between Aug 10th & the 24th?

    Palermo, Catania or Messina?

    If you know email me on Richard.Higham@dimensiondata.com
    @dimensiondata:disqus 
    Hope you can help

    Richie

  • why were Juve sent down?

    Envy.

    But I see you started and ended with rumors... I will not believe the FIGC will take any action against Inter or anyone else newly implicated until I see it written in stone. Why else would they precede Palazzi's findings with an announcement about the statute of limitations and Inter keeping their 2006 Scudetto last week?

    I would love to be proven otherwise, but this is the same FIGC that brought us Caliopoli 1, a.k.a. let's screw up an investigation as quickly as possible and make punishments according to public opinion instead of evidence. Why should they change now?

  • Dylan

    I partially agree with you, but I don't think the FIGC can pull out of a decision such as this now. Not with the papers all over it. If the evidence is there they will have to make a decision, such as removing the Scudetto. The only problem would be, as you mention, the statue of limitations. It depends who has full control of removal of Scudetti: the court or the FIGC.

  • I am an eternal optimist on most things in life, and an eternal cynic when it comes to the FIGC. I agree that the pressure is on to produce some sense of closure/justice, but they have left all of their options open, and it wouldn't be their first time they went against public opinion.

    As I understand it, the courts have control over a potential trial, the FIGC has full control over the removal of the Scudetto.

  • Dylan

    I guess we will just have to wait until they convene next week to decide. Great debate though, I'm really enjoying the World Cup blog too.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Us

           




Italy National Team News

Search The Offside


 




Related Links


Categories


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email italy[at]theoffside[dot]com

Write for The Offside

Archives