Inter Aren’t Talking, But Collina Is
By: Martha | January 22nd, 2008
Feeling terribly picked-on by the media frenzy surrounding his team’s win on Sunday, Inter bigwig Massimo Moratti indignantly refused to talk to the press yesterday. And, now, it seems, Roberto Mancini has got into the act, canceling his press conference ahead of tomorrow’s Coppa match with Juve. (It occurs to me that no one has seen Mancini since Zlatan absolutely crushed him at the end of Sunday’s match — it seems like there’s a fair chance that, in addition to ducking the press, he’s also in traction.)
Outside of the Inter camp, the fallout from Sunday’s match continues, with referee designator Pierluigi Collina addressing the calls (and non-calls) therein at a press conference yesterday. As you’d expect, Collina defended his referees and their extreme youth (Andrea Gervasoni, the man who was in charge of the Inter-Parma match, is only 32, and was working his 11th Serie A match.), saying that all officials will make mistakes, and must have the ability and poise to earn respect on the pitch. That said, Collina also admitted that the referee observer at the match indicated that a first-half penalty should have been awarded when Ivan Ramiro Cordoba wrestled Bernardo Corradi to the ground, and announced that Gervasoni won’t take charge of another match for three weeks, even though it was his assistant who called for the handball against Fernando Couto.
League president Antonio Matarrese, meanwhile, is also supporting the officials and poo-pooing accusations of corruption, but said of the pissed-off presidents of Parma, Torino and Napoli — all of whom went public with their anger at officials over the weekend — that he “shares their anger.” (Of course, according to goal.com’s translation of his words, Matarrese is also threatening to sue any club president who “thinks about causing trouble,” so just how gracious he’s being about all this is a little unclear.)
Category: 
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
      |
Comments
-
Silence speaks volumes.
Although to be honest, I don’t think it’s a conspiracy or another scandal.
I just think that in such an intimidating atmosphere as the San Siro, with Inter 2 - 1 down, a last minute penalty appeal comes along and if it’s 50 50 or even 40 60, the ref gives it.
Inter will cause a lot more trouble than Parma if it goes against them and the repurcussions will be worse.
Human nature I think
Posted from
United States
-
It’s true, the press generally seem readier to bury Inter for any perceived wrong than they do Milan or Juve. [Should have thought of it before you decided to make your money in oil instead of buying up a couple of newspapers, eh, Moratti clan?] The reaction seems a little petulant to me, but then Milan are rarely ever known to shut up about anything, so clearly I’m not used to this whole ‘keeping a dignified silence’ thing.
Posted from
India -
Roswitha, now your Careletto is defending Inter AND the referees! Will wonders never cease?
Posted from
United States -
Not when it comes to the big boys scratching each other’s backs in Serie A, surely? Although Inter, of course, have made a couple of minor departures thence in recent years.
Surely you didn’t miss Carletto saying, “… but I wouldn’t know, we never have that sort of thing over here!” while making said defence, though. :D
Posted from
India -
Gee, a series of reasoned and rational comments about this thing on here, whoda thunk it?
Romanista raises the classic Italian concept of “sudditanza psicologica”, the literal (and useless) translation of which is “psychological subjection”, but which actually means what he/she has outlined, that when faced with a 50/50 (or 45/55) decision in a stressful situation many Italians are inclined to go with the choice that they feel will be the least likely to get them into trouble and the one most likely to appeal to the “powerful”. It obviously is a concept of universal application, but among the G8 countries it tends to be thought to be particularly true here, where a belief in (and references to) “powerful forces” and “strong men” and the practice of “dietrologia” (literally “the study of what’s behind”, i.e., what the “real reasons” behind virtually any public or private action) are particularly strong.
Does “sudditanza psicologica” explain why the ref called the penalty against Couto but didn’t call one for Cordoba’s foul on Corradi? I don’t happen to think so (we were there, and I think the Couto decision was correct, if close, due to the fact that the ball would have gone in if it hadn’t hit his arm, and that a combination of the fog and an inattentive linesman was responsible for the Corradi mistake), but roughly two-thirds of the respondents to a Gazzetta poll on the subject believe the opposite, and this happens to be one of those cases in which perception is almost as important as reality. It is also true that the penalty that the Nerazzuri were given at Siena the week before was (to my mind) a worse mistake (more of the magnitude of Zalayeta dive bis or Trezeguet’s offside goal in the derby).
Declaring a “silenzio stampa” is one of the great traditions of Italian football, and it is probably more likely than not that on any given day during the season at least one club in the top three divisions isn’t talking to the press. In this particular case, it is a bit hard to see what the club could possibly say that wouldn’t be used to fuel a new set of speculative and sensational headlines. And the context of those headlines is largely commercial. Even putting house organs like Tuttosport aside, the Gazzetta and the other “quality” papers are very well aware that somewhere between half and two-thirds of their readers don’t support Inter, and that the large majority of that population support clubs that believe (with or without justification) that they were hard done by in Calciopoli and/or unfairly disadvantaged in this year’s competition by pro-Inter decisions. The commercial appeal of headlines that can fuel a sense of anti-Inter indignation is obvious (it works just the same way for Juve and Milan, btw).
And roswitha is (as always) very wise. Milan never do shut up, do they?
Posted from
Italy -
Hhahahhaa! I did miss that, thank you roswitha — needless to say, I feel much better now.
Thank you as always, Ursus, for your thoughts. I can’t imagine something like this happening without “sudditanza psicologica” being mentioned at this point — it’s become almost as big of a cliche as saying the big clubs always get the calls. They’re both so easy to say, and there are closely related truths in there somewhere, but it’s hard for me to dig them out because the responses of the media, public, and clubs to this sort of Incident are so almost choreographed now. I mean, the moment that penalty was called, I think 95% of us could described in great detail what the next 48 hours would be like — it strikes me that the baggage is so heavy and the context so dense that it’s impossible for anyone to respond ONLY to what happened on the pitch. If that makes any sense.
Posted from
United States -
No, they do not. It’s nice to support a club with opinions, you know. I’ll bet Inter are so grateful Milan chose to deputise for them and make the statement of gracious but firm denial in their stead. It’s what family is for. *g*
Your explanation for why the press has jumped on this bandwagon clarifies things very well for me, Ursus — it’s a bit depressing, though, that calcio’s obsession with this psychological slavery thing is really truly sustained at a level far beyond that of football elsewhere. The only other time I remember such a fuss being made over a bad decision this season, was when it went against Liverpool, against Villa, I think. [Which really says a lot about the levels of paranoia in Serie A, dunnit.] Since the ‘comedy Inter’ thing is not working so well anymore, I suppose football journalism does need to find a new peg to hang them on.
Posted from
India -
Against Liverpool, who were playing Villa.* Just to clarify that monster of a sentence.
Posted from
India -
Why is everybody forgetting the “leaked” information of the Livorno ref in the fall? Does everybody really think this sport is squeaky clean right now?
It’s one thing if this is a one off occurrence. It’s nearly every week with Inter. That’s something entirely else.
Posted from
United States
Comments are closed
Home 
